Which of the following is NOT a special negligence doctrine or statute?

The concept of "Assumption of Risk" is indeed a recognized legal doctrine related to negligence, but it does not fall under the category of a special negligence doctrine or statute that has been codified as a standalone law. Instead, assumption of risk is a common law principle that applies in tort law, where a plaintiff may be barred from recovery for injuries if they voluntarily exposed themselves to a known danger. This concept operates on the premise that individuals can assume the risks related to certain activities, and it is typically used as a defense in negligence cases rather than as a statute.

In contrast, the other options—Dram Shop Liability, Good Samaritan Statutes, and Negligence Per Se—are specific doctrines or statutes geared toward particular situations in which negligence may be assigned or interpreted differently. Dram Shop Liability deals with the responsibility of establishments serving alcohol for harm caused by their intoxicated patrons. Good Samaritan Statutes provide legal protection to individuals who offer assistance to others in an emergency, encouraging bystander intervention. Negligence Per Se applies when a defendant breaches a statute designed to protect a certain class of individuals, making it easier for plaintiffs to prove their case.

Thus, "Assumption of Risk Statutes" does not constitute a distinct statutory framework