What does it indicate if an injury would not have occurred without a breach?

The phrase "the injury would not have occurred without a breach" establishes a direct link between the breach and the injury. This is indicative of causation in fact, also known as "actual cause." It confirms that the breach of duty was a necessary condition for the injury to take place. To establish causation in fact, it must be shown that the injury would not have happened had the breach not occurred. This relationship is critical in legal contexts, particularly in negligence claims, as it helps to determine if the breach has indeed resulted in harm.

While causation is foundational for many legal principles, including negligence claims, the primary focus here is on the specific linkage that defines causation in fact.

The other options address broader concepts or outcomes related to legal proceedings or standards of professional conduct, which do not directly explain the causal relationship emphasized by the statement in the question.