In what scenario would a justiciable controversy not exist?

A justiciable controversy refers to a legal dispute that is suitable for judicial resolution, meaning it involves a real and substantive issue that can be resolved by the courts. In this context, a hypothetical scenario does not meet the criteria for justiciability, as it lacks the necessary components of a real case or controversy.

When an issue is hypothetical, it typically involves a question or situation that may never occur in reality or lacks the specificity needed to be actionable in a court of law. Courts deal with actual disputes where there are clear rights, obligations, and positions of parties involved. Therefore, if the controversy is purely theoretical without any concrete facts or circumstances, it cannot be adjudicated.

On the other hand, scenarios involving stakeholders, real threats, or legal arguments indicate that there are existing and tangible issues that can be addressed by the judiciary. Such situations signify that the parties have actual grievances or disputes that require resolution, making them justiciable.