In the context of borrowed servants, which employer is liable for injuries caused by an employee's negligence?

In the context of borrowed servants, liability for injuries caused by an employee's negligence primarily falls upon the employer who has primary control over the employee at the time the negligent act occurs. This principle stems from the concept of vicarious liability, where employers are held responsible for the actions of their employees if those actions arise within the scope of their employment.

When an employee is borrowed by another employer, the determination of who is liable often hinges on which employer had the right to direct and control the employee's work activities while they were performing their duties. The employer with primary control would dictate the work environment, provide task-specific directions, and potentially have the authority to discipline the employee, all of which are key factors in establishing liability.

While other options, such as paying the employee or providing training, may influence the relationship and responsibilities between the parties, these factors do not alone determine liability in the situation of a borrowed servant. Therefore, primary control is the critical factor that establishes which employer bears responsibility for the consequences of any negligent actions taken by the employee during the course of their duties.