In negligence theory, how does a tortfeasor regard the consequences of their actions?

In the context of negligence theory, the correct choice highlights a fundamental aspect of how a tortfeasor behaves with respect to their actions and their potential consequences. A tortfeasor, in this sense, is someone who has committed a wrongful act that causes harm to another, but they do so without the intent to cause harm or the belief that harm will likely result from their actions.

The phrase "neither wishes nor believes the consequences will occur" encapsulates the idea that negligence is characterized by a lack of intention and awareness regarding the detrimental outcomes of one's actions. Essentially, a tortfeasor may act in a manner that is careless or reckless, failing to exercise reasonable care, but does not intend to bring about harm nor does they assume that harm will occur. This is crucial for establishing negligence—there’s a breach of the duty of care that doesn’t stem from a malicious or intentional desire to cause injury.

When considering the other choices, they imply a more active awareness or intent on the part of the tortfeasor, either wishing for the consequences to happen, believing they will happen, or being entirely unaware of them. These notions do not align with the concept of negligence, as negligence specifically addresses situations where the person did not