In contract law, what typically triggers Complete Performance?

Complete Performance in contract law refers to a situation where a party fulfills all the terms and conditions of a contract as agreed. This means that the party has not only done what they promised but has done so in accordance with the standards set forth in the contract, whether those standards are expressly stated or implied.

The correct answer indicates that complete performance is typically triggered by full adherence to all express or implied conditions. This means that every obligation specified in the contract must be met without deviation. When both parties uphold their end of the agreement fully, it reflects the mutual understanding and intent that was originally established.

Other options do not directly trigger complete performance. For instance, amendments to the original terms (the first option) might change the conditions of the contract, but they do not, in themselves, ensure that the original performance conditions have been met. Additionally, a party's ability to perform under duress (the third option) relates to how performance is affected by coercion, which does not constitute complete performance according to contract law principles. Lastly, while conditions set forth in the initial agreement (the fourth option) are essential, simply having these conditions in place does not imply they have all been satisfied; it is the full adherence to them that triggers complete performance.