In an administrative hearing, what is a key difference compared to a traditional court trial?

In an administrative hearing, the process typically has distinct characteristics compared to a traditional court trial. One key difference is the nature of discovery and evidence presentation. In many administrative hearings, the process is designed to be less formal and more efficient, which can lead to extensive discovery and a broader opportunity for evidence presentation.

Administrative bodies often allow for a variety of evidence to be presented, including documents and testimonies, with a focus on making the hearing more accessible and quicker. This contrasts with traditional court trials, where the rules around discovery and evidence can be more stringent, often requiring formal processes and strict adherence to rules of evidence.

The relaxed procedural standards in administrative hearings can facilitate a more thorough examination of the facts, thereby assisting in the administrative body's objective of ensuring fairness and understanding in regulatory matters. This adaptability is essential for addressing specific administrative issues that may not require the same level of formality as criminal or civil court proceedings.